In various decision-making contexts, there arise situations where negative or zero desirability outcomes must be comprehensively assessed and balanced. This paper introduces an innovative approach, the Equilibrium Metrics, which presents a robust Composite Desirability Index designed to handle such scenarios. We propose a framework that accommodates the complexities of negative and zero desirability and leverages multi-dimensional data to provide a unified evaluation tool. By employing Equilibrium Metrics, decision-makers can make informed choices, optimize resource allocation, and mitigate risks in unconventional contexts where conventional metrics fall short.

Composite Desirability Index, Equilibrium Metrics, Negative Desirability

Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Cambridge University Press.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review.

Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press.

Edwards, W. (1977). How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-7(5), 326-340.

Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.